Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-4960HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than Core i7-4960HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4960HQ - 123 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4960HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4960HQ | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Crystal Well | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |