Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4940MX outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4940MX is 1550 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4940MX
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 340 vs 329 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 57 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4940MX - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
329
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4940MX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
57 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |