Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3420 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €182.45 vs €607.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900KS - €1.61 vs €4.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4930K - 141 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
113
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.31/FPS
37%
Price, €
€607.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |