Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 242 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Core i7-4930K - 53 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - €74.13 vs €113.84
- Up to 42% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4930K - €1.4 vs €2.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
47
88.67924528301887%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
57.85123966942148%
Price, €
€113.84
65%
Buy for €113.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
53
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |