Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €33.4 vs €117.91
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105 - €0.27 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4150 - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13928 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
30%
Price, €
€117.91
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |