Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1409 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4900MQ - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4900MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |