Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2052 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4700MQ - 348 vs 335 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |