Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2280 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-4610M - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 12 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |