Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2210 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i7-3630QM - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3630QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3630QM
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
