Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 184 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 135 vs 165 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |