Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Ryzen 5 1600 - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €74.94 vs €348.83
- Up to 78% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700KF - €0.37 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
22%
Price, €
€348.83
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €348.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |