Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-6600K - 229 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €188.88 vs €280.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-12700F - €1.04 vs €1.23 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
84%
Price, €
€280.99
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €280.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
79%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |