Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - 562 vs 542 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - €246.59 vs €262.59
- Up to 4% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-11700K - €0.45 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
562
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
95%
Price, €
€262.59
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for €262.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16811 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
542
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |