Buy on Amazon
€288.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Saints Row than Core i3-8100T - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €99.96 vs €288.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-10900F - €0.64 vs €1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
36%
Price, €
€288.88
34%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
156
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.96
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8100T processore 3,10 GHz 6 MB Cache intelligente
Buy for €99.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
