Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400F - 147 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - €141.58 vs €262.59
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-11700K - €1.07 vs €1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
59%
Price, €
€262.59
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €262.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5012 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |