Buy on Amazon
€265
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 219 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen 5 3500X - 184 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €100.29 vs €265.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-10700KF - €0.55 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Processore Intel® Core™ i7-10700KF per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,1 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
182
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.29
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Buy for €100.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
