Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 1283 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 388 vs 332 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 44 vs 16 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
388
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€312.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €312.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |