Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 330 days newer than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2400G - 174 vs 166 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |