Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 16 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €233.66 vs €635.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €233.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75257 minutes ago
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |