Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2187 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than FX-8350 - 266 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8350 - €228.88 vs €285.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8350 - €0.86 vs €1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€228.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |