Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2828 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-650 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €148.8 vs €176.88
- Up to 8% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-8400 - €1.35 vs €1.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €176.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |