Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €19.99 vs €444.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-12900F - €0.14 vs €1.87 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 70% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-760 - 238 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
140
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |