Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4454 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €19.99 vs €535.08
- Up to 95% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900KF - €0.11 vs €2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Core i5-760 - 232 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
190
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
4%
Price, €
€535.08
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €535.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |