Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €67.44 vs €246.59
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900F - €0.37 vs €1.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7400 - 193 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11068 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
28%
Price, €
€246.59
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |