Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1126 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470S - 132 vs 117 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €42.73 vs €188.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-6600K - €0.37 vs €1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
117
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |