Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €188.88 vs €261.39
- Up to 26% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 3300X - €1.08 vs €1.46 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-6600K - 179 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
73%
Price, €
€261.39
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |