Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3112 days newer than Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-6500 - 164 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
127
77.4390243902439%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1177
38.973509933774835%
Multi-Core
3217
17.60810071154899%
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |