Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1635 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2400 - 522 vs 456 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €115.34 vs €273.66
- Up to 52% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-6400 - €0.25 vs €0.52 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
522
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
48.07692307692307%
Price, €
€273.66
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €273.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3661 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
456
87.35632183908046%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€115.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €115.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
554
49.86498649864986%
Multi-Core
1607
53.15911346344691%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |