Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €108.66 vs €159.18
- Up to 29% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - €0.42 vs €0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-4690 - 270 vs 260 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
260
96.29629629629629%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
71.1864406779661%
Price, €
€159.18
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
77.38791423001949%
Multi-Core
3303
71.40077821011673%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |