Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €43.99 vs €151.33
- Up to 71% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10320 - €0.22 vs €0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i5-4690 - 203 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
198
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15420 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
29%
Price, €
€151.33
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |