Buy on Amazon
€43.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 2029 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Athlon 3000G - 404 vs 393 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €43.99 vs €82.24
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Athlon 3000G - €0.11 vs €0.21 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
404
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CPU Intel i5-4690 ad alte prestazioni - TDP 84W, interfaccia Intel LGA 1150, velocità di clock 3,2 GHz, cache L3 da 6 MB, 4 core, fabbricazione chip 22 nm
Buy for €43.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13696 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G Processore con grafica Radeon Vega 3 (2C/4T, orologio base da 3,5 GHz)
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
