Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-4670T - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 24 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-4670T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
