Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1765 days older than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100T - 127 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - €182.45 vs €186.88
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670 - €1.46 vs €1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €186.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2698 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
125
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |