Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2844 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4670 - 223 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - €144.61 vs €186.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4670 - €0.65 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €186.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11304 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €144.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |