Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Core i5-4300M - 88 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 6 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |