Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 37 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4300M - 194 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |