Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3869 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-3475S - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
600
26.33889376646181%
Multi-Core
1660
21.444257847823277%
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |