Buy on Amazon
€42.73
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €42.73 vs €246.59
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900F - €0.37 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470S - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
117
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
CHYYAC Processore Intel Core I5-3470S I5 3470S 2,9 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 6M 65W LGA 1155
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12303 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
20%
Price, €
€246.59
17%
FPS Winner
Intel - Processore Core i9-10900F 10 Core 2,8 GHz Socket LGA 1200 Tray Senza Scatola
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
