Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1896 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i5-3317U - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 24 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i5-3317U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
