Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2450M outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2450M is 296 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2450M
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-2450M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2450M | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
