Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1710 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 264 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 64 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Vishera | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
