Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €25.19 vs €484.76
- Up to 94% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-12900F - €0.1 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-2320 - 275 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2320 - 24 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €25.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for €484.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2320 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |