Buy on Amazon
€25.19
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €25.19 vs €246.59
- Up to 87% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-10900F - €0.23 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-2320 - 136 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2320 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2320 - 20 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2320
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
108
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.19
100%
Value Winner
RENKTE Processore CPU Intel Core I5-2320 I5 2320 3,0 GHz Quad-Core 6M 95W LGA 1155
Buy for €25.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14320 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
12%
Price, €
€246.59
10%
FPS Winner
Intel - Processore Core i9-10900F 10 Core 2,8 GHz Socket LGA 1200 Tray Senza Scatola
Buy for €246.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2320
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
