Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 3698 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130T - 218 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - €30.28 vs €291.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14600KF - €0.17 vs €1.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €291 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |