Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 50% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2400S - 672 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €69.9 vs €201.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - €0.16 vs €0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €201 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
449
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |