Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 316 vs 293 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €184.0 vs €635.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.58 vs €2.17 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
316
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€184
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14704 minutes ago
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |