Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4100 - 165 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €22.88 vs €157.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13400F - €0.15 vs €0.96 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
16%
Price, €
€157.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |