Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 121 vs 104 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €75.43 vs €188.75
- Up to 53% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.73 vs €1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
46%
Price, €
€188.75
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12791 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |