Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-3550 - 187 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €34.99 vs €117.5
- Up to 65% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11400F - €0.22 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
34%
Price, €
€117.5
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7452 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |