Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 35% better in F1 23 than Core i5-4440 - 260 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €39.87 vs €117.5
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-11400F - €0.21 vs €0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
46%
Price, €
€117.5
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2695 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
192
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |