Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-10105F - 210 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €69.02 vs €132.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400 - €0.34 vs €0.63 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
53%
Price, €
€132.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €132.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |